Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:05pm
|
|
Courageous When Prudent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,950
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
If your point is that the clause is superfluous, then I probably agree (with the possible exception of the "bounce shot"). It might be left over from some previous rule change (that is, it used to be required, but a rule change has now made it not required).
I also don't see that it causes any harm.
|
I'm asking b/c it is on the test and I got it wrong. 
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
|