View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 19, 2013, 08:03pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
You're a lot more than half right, and I'm a lot more than half wrong. We have half a rule, on how to line such a court, but we don't have a rule that explains how to use these parallel lines for the ten second rule, and the backcourt rule. I never realized, until today that the NFHS doesn't explain how to use these two lines. Did it ever?

I always thought that bob jenkins' post answer was a real rule. Guess not. But I still like his explanation, and, as usual, always listen to bob.
It sounds to me like you are talking about another issue then just a smaller court. It seems to me like you are talking about more the size of the FC area. If that is the case I have seen courts that provide an extra line that once the division line is crossed, the secondary line is to allow the offense room to move in the FC. I have worked on a court that had that configuration but it was more like a ground rule so the game could be played. But I have been on many courts where the length was never an issue in this area so we never needed a secondary line.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote