View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 26, 2013, 02:44pm
sniez sniez is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
I'm pretty sure FIBA is different here, and this play is a violation. Billy's myths do not apply to FIBA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay R View Post
You do need team control for a an over and back violation in FIBA and I don't see team control here for the red team.

So what is the right decision here? In FIBA rulebook there is:

30.1.2 The ball has been illegally returned to the backcourt when a player of the team in control of the live ball is the last to touch the ball in his frontcourt, after which that player or a team-mate is the first to touch the ball in the backcourt.

and

14.1.1 Team control starts when a player of that team is in control of a live ball by holding or dribbling it or has a live ball at his disposal.

So it's quite similar to NBA.



Quote:
Originally Posted by dvboa View Post


NFHS
4.12.2 SITUATION: During a throw-in by A1 from the sideline by Team A the throw-in is touched in the front court by A2 before it goes across the division line where it is recovered by A2.
Ruling: Legal even though Team A is in team control during the throw-in. A2 must have player control in the front court following the inbound in order to have front court status.
In this situation, official calls a violation. Is there any movie, where referee doesn't call BC violation?
Reply With Quote