Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives
Because if you only had first and second listed for the condition then it wouldn't be in effect if the bases were loaded.
Before you say "BUT!" - think it through again.
|
BUT
the statement/rule is worded for the stupid.
The requirement is met when there is a runner on 1st base and a runner on 2nd base. If the bases are loaded, is that requirement still not met? Is there not still a runner on 1st base and a runner on 2nd base?
Trying to justify the stance that too many runners on base negates a given rule is just as moronic as all the idiots screaming "it's in the hole" on every tee shot.