Quote:
Originally Posted by OKREF
Last summer at a camp I attended this was told to us.
If you have contact and a foul on one end, then the next trip on the other end if you have contact that is equal to or greater than what was just called you need to have a foul.
Conversely
If you have contact and no foul called, then the next trip, if you have contact that is equal to or less than what was just passed on you need to pass on it.
Consistency among the crew was his point.
|
All this is a theory, and a good one, but that's all it is. You give this to the wrong coach, and all you have is more food for argument.
"C'mon, ref, that contact was equal to or greater than what you just called on us!!"
"No, coach, it wasn't even close."
Consistency is a by-product of good officiating, not a building block.
A pitch on the outside corner is a strike. The next pitch, also on the outside corner, is also a strike, because it was on the outside corner, not because it was in any way similar to the last pitch. The next pitch is a micro-inch further outside, still very similar, but it is a ball.