Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
I think we had a very long discussion on this a while back. Reading the RS, it seems that could refer only to the person obstructed being involved in the interference.
Would not accepting the enforcement of the rule negate the play? And if you negate the play, how can you have interference on a play that didn't exist?
|
You're right, of course. See the ASA Rules clarification from June 2008. Now I'm trying to figure out where I heard wrong.
