Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantherdreams
First one is a coin toss for me. The defenders leg is extended beyond but I can't tell if the intial contact was chest and shoulder and then the D gets tangled in the leg on the way down or if the entanglement with the leg to the legal upper body contact.
2nd - illegal screen the only thing making contact is extended forearms
3rd - I don't have anything on the thrid one. Screener is set and braces himself never extends outside his vertical area. (imo). Very physical play but screener isn't doing anything illegal.
|
Agree with all of this. #1 has a wide stance but the wide stance isn't the problem, the contact occurs with the torso primarily, so I would agree with the no call.