Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad
Pretty much this.
A backcourt violation on this sequence of plays is awful.
Why do some officials come up with the most contrived rulings on plays that should just be straight-forward and obvious?
How can an official determine that the initial throw from the backcourt was a crappy pass vs a crappy shot? He can't.
Stop trying to be judges of intent and simply judge what happened.
When in doubt, make the obvious call.
A backcourt here isn't obvious — it is nit-picky, over-thinking, and wrong.
|
So if I understand you, this should be a shot based on the fact that it hit the backboard? Do you have a rule or case play that backs your intrp here? Or are you simply saying that your judgement of intent here is more valid than others who say they would judge it a pass?