Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
That's the whole problem. In the OP, I say the player should not have been directed to leave.
|
This is the better way to put it.
If play is already stopped for an extended period due to a charged timeout, player injury, or another situation then I'm essentially telling the coach to get the blood situation corrected not directing the player to leave the game.
The intent and purpose of the rule is to address the blood situation with as little disruption of the game as possible. If it can be addressed during the course of stoppage for another reason then what purpose is served by insisting that the player must sit out?
Nobody has answered that question.