Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
It's exactly what it says, according to everyone but you. I can never remember if you refuse to believe it means what everyone says it means or if you just want to insist they shouldn't do it that way.
|
Actually, perhaps the biggest problem I have with the universal interpretation is when it is
not applied.
"One official
calls a blocking foul............the other official
calls a charging foul."
Me: It says calls, not signals. Not the same thing.
Everybody else: A signal is a call. That's what it means.
BUT, if the signal (call) made by the first official is only a fist, without a preliminary signal, that call/signal doesn't matter.
The guy signaled (called) a foul, the same as the other guy. He knows what his call was, but now it doesn't matter.
Why?