Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee
We were always taught in my previous area that each set are treated completely different.
The players on court fighting is one set.
Players leaving and not fighting is another.
Players leaving and fighting is another.
This way we track 3 sets of T's and administer each accordingly as in which ever team has an uneven number for each set shoots.
|
Can you then have FT's at each end? I like the idea of "you should never shoot FT's at both ends of the court" I'm an accountant and that way I get to add up the FT's awarded, cancel out and only administer the remainder. Then draw a double line under my totals and call it balanced!
A confusing issue is that all T's (concerning bench personnel) are not necessarily awarded FT's. (penalties 10-8) By that nature, I don't think it is as easy as adding up the T's or players and then calculating FT's.
I completely agree that each "set" mentioned above are treated differently. But I don't think the rule is written that simply. There is still the application of indirects appiled to HC. I am not sure that "whichever team has an uneven number . . . shoots" is correct.