View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2012, 01:46pm
celebur celebur is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by cal9323 View Post
I can tell you 100% that if he did not touch the ball there is NO WAY that ball would have gone under the fence.
That is irrelevant to the rule. What matters is (1) did he have possession or was he still playing a batted ball, and (2) did he do this intentionally or not.

If the ball's status was still a batted ball, and if the umpire ruled this was unintentional, then the award for this is a 'book-rule double' (not a ground-rule double).

Sometimes, it may seem that the rules burn one team or the other. In this case, you think the offense got robbed of additional bases. There are other scenarios where the defense will think the offense got more bases than they deserved. But the ruling is the same.
Reply With Quote