Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
They are coming up with it because the only two options with a runner that is ON the base is either A) nothing or B) intentional interference and 2 outs.
1 out is not a choice, but that's what we got. I don't think anyone is saying we SHOULD have 2 outs here or the runner intentionally interfered... they are just saying that IF we have interference, it MUST be of the intentional variety which would give us 2 outs.
|
I edited my quoted post while you were commenting.
The citation does not say interference must be ruled intentional. It says if ruled intentional get 2.
I think they blew it. It should have been protested so it got cleared up.