View Single Post
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 22, 2012, 10:22am
DTQ_Blue DTQ_Blue is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 164
A possible explanation that would make sense

Nats F2, Jesus Flores, had an interesting comment on the play in the W. Post. He said that he thought PU thought that the bases were loaded in which case in PU's mind, there would be no timing play on the first runner because the play at 3rd would be a force. That could explain why PU didn't even indicate whether or not the run scored after the 3rd out. Only when Mattingly came out to ask about the run did PU then realize that the out at 3rd was not a force.

The W. Post article didn't state whether Flores said that PU told him this or not, but this explanation is easier to conceive of than PU knowing that the runner on 3rd could be involved in a timing play but then forgetting to watch for the tag/touch. The T play signal would have been given, but PU would not be thinking that it applied to the lead runner.
Edit/Delete Message
Reply With Quote