Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
It might be maneuvering, but it's wrong. She should be suing her insurance company for a covered injury, not going after the kid, his family, the league, the umpires, etc.
The insurance company would not be traumatized by the lawsuit, and it would not be frivolous or likely to be dismissed without a trial.
|
When you say "She should be suing her insurance company for a covered injury" you simply have no clue as to what you're talking about. For starter's check out the difference between "First Person Coverage" (eg uninsured motorist, or Health Insurance coverage) and "Third Person Coverage" (eg your typical automobile or homeowners coverage).
Pray tell, Mr. Darrow, under what insurance policy is she going to "sue her insurance company"?
This kind of comment is no different than a Hawk Harrelson umpire rant