Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
Yes, actually, it can be.
You're absolutely right, which is why I have an issue with your original post. BI has intricacies based on what happens with the ball, batter, and catcher, and is evaluated conditionally based on those facts. Blanket statements such as yours that are inaccurate gloss over those intricacies and find themselves as improper guidelines that actually get used.
So, yes, I'm going to nit-pick, because I want it called correctly.
|
OK, I want it called correctly also. The highlighted part above is judgement, isn't it.
I don't think my original post was wrong, although it may have been incomplete. But I think you are reading too much into it. I just tried to keep it simple. There is no doubt in my mind that you and I both know what constitutes interference and will make the approprite call.