Sun Jun 03, 2012, 02:07am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm21711
Clemson's coach was arguing that the interference didnt affect the play and it "had not been called in their 52 other games this season." Give me a break. He used that as justification the runner from 3B should have been allowed to score. Correct me if Im wrong, but at the point of interference the ball is dead, right?
|
Sounds like something a true rat would say.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
|