View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 08, 2000, 10:59am
Todd VandenAkker Todd VandenAkker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 378
Wink

Ooh, I love semantics! So . . . a common foul IS a personal foul (4-19-2), so we're both right. And your casebook play was essentially the same one as I mentioned, but certainly explained the scenario and ruling more fully. Didn't even look further when I found the one I cited.
Reply With Quote