Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Why would you want that?
Keep it simple.
A player who touches the ball while OOB has committed an OOB violation and the throwin spot is the spot where they touched the ball.
Why complicated it with which player touches it or whether it is from a throwin or not? Your idea doesn't really solve or improve anything?
You'd also have to decide if A2 stepped OOB before or after touching the ball....and the splitting of that hair could make a big difference regarding the throwin spot. If you keep it at the spot of the touch, it is simple.
If A2 and B2 are both going for the ball and one is OOB, you have to split another hair...who touched it first and the result could drastically different. As it is, you only care that the player OOB touched the ball...the order doesn't matter.
....
|
Not all that complicated, we should be capable of making those distinctions. And we have to make certain disctinctions anyway to determine whether or not time should come off the clock. Team A is responsible for a legal throw-in. A2 catching the ball while already OOB violates that, IMO.