View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 05, 2003, 11:41am
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
Once again, I am in the midst of the annual debate over a situation that never seems to get resolved. I have knowledgeable local ASA officials telling me that a SP pitcher commits an illegal pitch if he uses a motion intended to "deceive" the batter, even if the pitch is otherwise legal.

The particular pitch in question is the one in which the pitcher takes his pause with the ball in front of his hip and then makes a full revolution of the arm before delivering the ball. (This way he still delivers the ball on the first pass of the hip.) They argue that if a pitcher has used a conventional motion throughout the game, he commits an illegal pitch if in, say, the sixth inning, he suddenly adopts a different motion with the intent to deceive the batter. In other words, it's a legal motion if the pitcher uses it consistently, but an illegal motion if he uses it as a tool of deception.

I have argued that the book does not support such a ruling, and that therefore a pitcher can deliver pitches with 17 different motions as long as each motion is legal. They admit that there's nothing in black and white, but claim that "interpretation" has laid some sort of foundation for this.

Anybody know something I don't on this subject?
I don't like doing this, but if they want "interpretation", here it is in black and white:

2003 ASA Clinic Guide, Rule 6 - Pitching - Slow Pitch, Page 37:

Quote:
RELEASE
1. The ball must be release on the first FORWARD swing of the arm past the hip.
2. The ball may not be released behind the back or through the legs.
3. The ball cannot be released from the glove.
4. The palm may be under or over the ball on the release.
5. The pitch must be of moderate speed.
6. The pitch must have an arc between 6 and 12 feet from the ground.
7. The pitcher may not continue the motion after the release of the ball.
8. There may be no stop or reversal of the forward motion.
(My emphasis)
9. The windmill delivery may be used.
You need further proof of interpretation? Check play 6S.3-4 in the 2003 ASA Case Book:

Quote:
The pitcher comes to a one-second stop, then takes the ball in his pitching hand over the top of his head, down and around in a windmill type oaction, and releases the ball the first time past the hip.

RULING:
Legal. A windmill delivery is legal if the ball is release the first time past the hip and all other aspects of the pitching rule are followed. (6S-3D; 6S-1B)
It does NOT say it can only be used if throughout the entire game. It does NOT say it cannot be used to possibly confuse the batter.

If that were the case, than these guys must believe that a pitcher who throws a 7'-8' arc for 5 innings all of a sudden throws a ball to 11', it must be illegal because they tried to deceive or confuse the batter. Same with the hand. If the pitcher suddenly changes from pitching the ball with his/her palm facing up, wouldn't it be a deceptive act to all of a sudden throw a pitch with the palm down and putting backspin on it?

I'm sorry, but being from North Jersey, these guys should know the only thing that holds foundations together are the bodies added to the concrete

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote