Quote:
Originally Posted by IUgrad92
So officials are innocent until proven guilty, while the other side is guilty until proven innocent. I believe that sums up your logic.....
|
Is that so surprising? Somebody was wrong. Under the circumstances, an official or a fan did something wrong (possibly both). Giving the benefit of the doubt to the official implies that the fan did something wrong. The logic is sound.
Giving the benefit of the doubt is different from defending someone, come what may. But I don't see that here.