Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43
True if INT was by the batter. We are talking about a retired batter, in which case you would be wrong. Again 7.09e
There is a distict difference between batter interference and interferece by a retired batter. Different rules, different interpretations.
|
As there should be... in case one, ruling the batter out is an appropriate penalty... in case to, batter is already out and would be NO penalty.
Quote:
|
It really isn't that difficult.
|
Truly. Truly stunned at the big names here not noticing the most important part of the equation.