Thread: Another First
View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 14, 2012, 12:52pm
Adam's Avatar
Adam Adam is offline
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scuba_ref View Post
And that is all I am trying to say...we have to judge the act.

Case 4.19.3.C uses foul examples that would be intentional at any point during the game...grabbing the jersey or a two-handed push in the back. A hold by the defense on an offensive player away from the ball that would get a hold call in the third quarter will still get a hold call at the end of the fourth quarter. I'm not upgrading to an intentional simply because I know the defense is trying to stop the clock. The case book comment gives me all I need to defend that call. The comment doesn't state the foul has to be against the player with the ball.
Did you read the ruling in 4.19.3C?
Quote:
It is an intentional personal foul designed to stop the clock from starting or to neutralize an opponent's obvious advantageous position.
Like I told the coach, it's not an automatic INT, but I should have added that the threshold for it goes down in this situation if they try to foul a player not involved in the play.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote