View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 31, 2012, 04:45am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
The NCAA ruling is very clear in the Case Book. I'm not sure why you are posting this. Is there some point which you are trying to call to our attention?
(BTW the ruling in HS is the same as another forum member has posted above.)

Ball in Play When Free Throw is Missed
A.R. 204.
The official informs the players along the free-throw lane that two
free throws shall be awarded when a one-and-one bonus is in effect.
(1) While all other players remain inactive, A2 rebounds the ball
and successfully scores a goal. The official discovers that he or
she misinformed the players; or
(2) B2 rebounds the ball and passes it to the official, who is
positioned out of bounds. The official discovers that he or she
misinformed the players.

RULING: The official’s misinformation to the players caused the
inactivity. As a result, in both (1) and (2), the ball shall be put in play
with the use of the alternating-possession arrow. In (1), A2’s goal shall
not count. A1 did attempt his or her merited free throw, so there is no
error to correct. When any time has elapsed off the game clock and the
official has knowledge of this time, he or she shall rectify the situation.
(Rule 8-5, 4-53.2.d and 5-11.1)
Reply With Quote