Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
Yup. In a case like this, I am in support of rules changes that permit a change to the last play of a game.
We all know that the last play of the game was officiated grossly wrong. Cancel the hoop and go to overtime.
If a rules change submission needs a lawsuit to give it some legs, then I'm in favour of that lawsuit.
I know the economy is tough right now, and that may be a mitigating factor in the ability to do so, but for a play like this, it is easily solved with replay. An HD camcorder hooked up to a video monitor is about $500 here in my area. Schools likely have a capable monitor anyways, so all that is needed now is an HD camcorder. If a school has an AV group, then they likely have a camcorder too.
And wasn't this an NCAA game? Washington U, as in University? Doesn't NCAA have replay? Or is that for D1 only?
|
You're really in favor of having your butt hauled into court every time you work a game? Because once you open that floodgate, people will litigate every foul and violation you call, no matter the final point spread.
No, the referees should remain the final arbiter of the rules of the game and courts should continue to keep their noses out of it. After all, they have things that actually matter that they already can't get to without having to decide whether a shot grazed a rim or not.
If you don't want a referee's mistake at the end of a game to cost you a win, lead by more than 4 points at the end.