Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I was under the impression that this was because Valentine talked to the media or Referee Magazine, not for giving a third T. That was a long time ago and I will not claim to know all the details, but this interview was rather extensive. And at that time there was even less transparency than there is today.
Peace
|
The article actually states that he was censured for the 2nd technical. Not the 3rd.
Although now that I'm re reading it, the article could mean Valentine's 2nd technical, which may have been the 3rd technical. Or it could mean the 2nd technical overall and not the 3rd as I interpreted.
Someone should have proofread that article
