Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty
Yes I get it. But what you also show is that this violation should probably be called even less than I would call it. Which has been pretty much never. Because I'm (rightly or wrongly) using advantage to call this, no matter how he got there.
|
This is the only issue I have with how you're calling it, because it ignores the rule. As the 9.3.3 cases (A, B, C) make clear, only stepping out of bounds
intentionally (to gain an advantage) constitutes a violation under 9-3-3. So it matters how he got there.