Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Sure it does. He blocked the pass with his hand....legal. If the foot was in the original path of the ball, and the ball still hit it after a minor deflection, I could agree with still calling a kick as the foot was put in the path of the ball and became relevant.
|
Where in the rule does the kicking violation say it applies only to a pass? If this pass deflected off
another player's hand and then was kicked, wouldn't you be calling the violation? What difference does it make whose hand it deflected off?
The player intentionally contacted the (live) ball with his leg. Doesn't matter what it touched before that. Violation.
It sounds to me that you're ruling that this was not intentional contact: the initial attempt to kick failed, the ball deflected off his hand, and then the ball accidentally hit his leg. I'd be OK with that ruling, if that's what you're judging happened.