Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
In the case play: The official has JUDGED that the actions rise to the level of "for the purpose of disconcerting or hindering".
In your games, the official has judged that the actions DO NOT rise to that level.
|
Yeah, well according to some people their "judgment" is not in accordance with the rules...
As for the "warn then flag" approach: I can imagine an extreme case where B's actions could ONLY be interpreted as disconcerting. But that's rarely what we see.
We usually see borderline cases: the point of warning is to let B know that their actions are borderline, and if they persist it might become apparent that their aim is to disconcert. And at that point, they would warrant the flag.