View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 08, 2003, 11:25am
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Re: Theory.

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
I totally agree in thoery you should not call things you do not see. I agree that in a 2 person game it can be even more difficult to call many things with so much to cover. But I will say this. You will call things you do not see all the time. Or at least not see the entire play. You might see the very end and have to make a split second decision of what actually happen.

Peace
While kinda off-topic, I agree 100% with Rut on this. There is an element of "educated guessing" in 2-man when you're working a fast, competetive game, simply because there's too much happening at once. Not always, not most of the time, but occasionally you need to reconstruct what "might" have happened when making a call.

In the original sitch, if the T did not have a whistle there's no way he can help the L on this. As for not being in position, well, it happens in 2 man. Maybe this was one of those times where a good "guess" would have lead to the right call.
Reply With Quote