|
I must be over-thinking . . .again
So, if the dribble hasn't ended, and was just interrupted, the 10-second count would continue. (This wasn't a factor in the play, but is a thought that occurred during my searching for rule support for a correct ruling.) It seems that the two unattended bounces could establish frontcourt status for the ball, similar to Case Book 9.8 situation B. 4-12-1 indicates that there is no player control, during the interrupted dribble, and 4-12-2 c indicates that there is team control, during the interrupted dribble, and 9-9-1 could be involved, thius causing a backcourt violation. Comments?
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . 
|