View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 26, 2011, 08:07pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcannizzo View Post
We all have an understanding of the logic and reason for the existence of certain rules, LBR, IFF, D3K, and countless others.

In some cases, there may be "old wive's tales" which I suspect behind why it is a dead ball strike when the batter gets hit by a pitch while in the act of swinging. The way I heard it told was back in the day, players would take a full swing at a pitch, and purposely allow the ball to hit off their arms/hands, equating to a bunted ball, and that some umpires got fooled by this trick and it was deemed unfair to the defense. Whether true or not, it makes for a good story.

I am interested in researching this topic further and haven't figured out the right search term for google to find a source for this type of information.

Perhaps we can have a fun thread here with this if others have interesting, factual and even unprovable logic for other rules.

What say ye?
I say the ball is dead because it hit the batter and has nothing to do with whether the batter attempted to strike the ball or not.

If you keep the ball live, the defense may not have access to the ball. You think batters intentionally take a hit now, what do you think would happen if the runners could advance while the ball is rolling away from the catcher?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote