
Fri Jun 17, 2011, 08:32am
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25
It is clear from the play that the PU wasn't utilizing 2.50; rather, he instinctively ruled batter's interference, which it was not. Heck, after realizing it was ball 4--he acknowledged as much--he didn't even follow through with the typical delayed dead ball penalty. Only after Augie complained did he get together with the crew and pull this incorrect ruling out of thin air.
|
Now that's funny
|