Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey
Citation?
I wouldn't say this is a mess, but it certainly does expose a messy potential.
Rules are, in a nutshell, agreements. That is, it's been agreed that this is the way we're going to play, and how we're going to handle these defined situations. In this case, it's not that a rule needs to be changed, it's the penalty that needs to be more clearly defined. Otherwise, these disagreements will continue.
|
There's nothing to disagree with here.
The rule says when the ball becomes dead. There's your citation. There is nothing in the book that says we can ignore that particular rule just because we think it's more fair to do so. The penalty is clearly defined, you just don't think it's enough.
The case play Camron is using applies to unsporting behavior, not contact.