Thread: NBA philosophy
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 18, 2003, 08:32am
dhodges007 dhodges007 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 426
Send a message via AIM to dhodges007 Send a message via Yahoo to dhodges007
Quote:
Originally posted by Andy
I was able to attend the Boston-Phoenix game last night (free tickets) and have a question about the philosophy of calling the NBA game. I know that some of the folks on this board have had some NBA-type exposure and may be able to comment.

I can remember two specific plays that originated from the trails coverage area, player drives to the basket toward the lead. Ball comes loose and there is no whistle from either the trail or lead, but after a second or so delay, the center makes a call.

To me, this just seems the opposite of what three-man mechanics are there for. I know the NBA does some things differently, but just wondered about the philosophy in this particular situation.
One philosophy in the NBA is to referee your primary, but see everything on the floor. My only guess without seeing the play is that the T and L both had the same angle on the play and couldn't see what happened, so the C came and got it. Also, remember in the NBA, every play and every call is scrutinized, s/he must have seen something that his/her partners didn't and came in late.
__________________
~Hodges

My two sense!
Reply With Quote