Chris,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Viverito
I think "while he is at bat" is being taken too literally. ...
|
On the other hand, I don't think it's being taken litereally enough - at least by some people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Reed
JM,
What "causuality"? The OBR rule lists two penalties when an improper batter completes his at bat:
1) the proper batter is out.
2) any runners who had advanced by reason of the improper batter's batted ball, or were forced to advance, are returned to their original base.
Those are the only two penalties. In OP1, R2 wasn't forced, and there was no batted ball. Therefore, by rule he does not return.
To all---
FED and NCAA both return all runners who advanced after the improper batter had completed his time at bat. So in OP1, the runner would return if the game is played under NCAA or FED rules. OBR is different.
|
The causality implicit in phrases like "...by reason of.." and "...because of...".
And your paraphrase of the OBR rule is not
exactly what it says, is it? Because a "batted ball" is in no way required, from the plain unambiguous text of the rule, in order to nullify a runner's advance. (i.e. ...because of the improper batter’s advance to first base on a hit, an error, a
base on balls, a hit batter or otherwise."
To me, the "because of" clause of the rule really just means "on a play where the batter completed his at bat". Of course, I can't "prove it".
I believe the OBR, NCAA, and FED rules are all identical with regard to nullifying other runner's advances, thought the wording IS slightly different.
JM