View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 27, 2011, 10:10am
Scrapper1 Scrapper1 is offline
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer View Post
I actually would like to see something similar to this in NCAA (no buying yourself outta a violation).
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Me too. If Team A calls a timeout they only get unexpired portion of backcourt count.
Why? If a team chooses to burn a time-out, why shouldn't they be able to "buy" themselves a new 10-seconds, or 5-seconds on a throw-in? Team control has ended with the time-out, so how can they be in "continuous" control to continue the count from where it was before the time-out?

This is the same reason I disagree with the rule about not granting a time-out when an airborne player is heading out of bounds. If they want to burn a time-out to save a possession, why should it matter if they are airborne or not? It just makes no sense, and it's inconsistent with the rest of the rules.
Reply With Quote