Sat Mar 26, 2011, 10:05pm
|
|
Archaic Power Monger
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by snaqwells
like i said, i wasn't commenting on the play since i haven't seen it. My point is simple, that in spite of the fact that there are other criteria to consider, a player fouling a shooter from behind gets more scrutiny. And yes, "obvious advantage" is directly from the rule, so i'm not sure how you can disagree with it.
Frankly, as described by tref, i'd call the intentional (grabbing a shooter from behind), but again, i haven't seen the play.
|
+1
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
|