Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone
Well, I am happy for the umpires in Ohio however, when the iterperters start supporting their documented interpretation with references, then I might be more inclined to agree with them. As of now, I will side with Carl.
Of course, in 28 years I have never had this play and may never see it in the next 28 yrs either.
I am not disagreeing with the Ohio ruling, I am just not yet convinced to agree.
|
I agree with your point about "never in 28 years." Still, it would be nice to iron out this wrinkle. Given its rarity, we might not get anything from NFHS.
I don't suppose it would sway your opinion to learn that Ohio's lead interpreter is Kyle McNeely, current chair of the NFHS Baseball Rules Committee? Nah, didn't think so.
