Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Actually, these plays appear in the 2011 Case book, pp. 91-92. Here's the one MIB is "overthinking":
@MIB: do you not have the rulings with the situations, or do you just not believe them?  |
I have them and I believe them. The rulings don't mention what replacing one CR with another does to the eligibility of the first one. The rule tells us that the CR is not considered a substitute FOR the STARTER (F1/F2) for whom he is running. That's the end of what it tells us.
I get it, and I'm good with it - but I may "go there" just for kicks.
