Quote:
Originally Posted by soundedlikeastrike
The definition of "foul" okay, I see your angle. however none of my OBR based literature offers a definition of FOUL. so don't know where you going with that?
However the OP and my statements concern a "foul ball".
The definition of "foul ball" can very well be dependent on whether caught or not. In the OP as I see the intent, is 100% "dependent" on whether caught or not.
OBR Definition:
A FOUL BALL is a batted ball that settles on foul territory between home and first base, or between home and third base, or that bounds past first or third base on or over foul territory, or that first falls on foul territory beyond first or third base, or that, while on or over foul territory, touches the person of an umpire or player, or any object foreign to the natural ground.
The definition of a catch however, has no dependence on fair or foul.
OBR Definition:
A CATCH is the act of a fielder in getting secure possession in his hand or glove of a ball in flight and firmly holding it; providing he does not use his cap, protector, pocket or any other part of his uniform in getting possession.
|
1) You said none of the literature defines foul then you quote the rule that defines it.
2) You said fair/foul can be dependent on caught or not - but you quoted the rule which makes no mention of the location of the ball.
Lets look at the relevant part:
A FOUL BALL is a batted ball . . . that, while on or over foul territory, touches the person of an umpire or player, or any object foreign to the natural ground.
Was the ball over foul ground - yes.
Did it touch a player while there? - Yes
It's foul.
Caught/Not Caught is completely independent of fair/foul.
Live/dead on a foul ball IS dependent on caught/not caught, but first you have to know 1) was it fair or foul and 2) was it caught or not.