Quote:
Originally Posted by soundedlikeastrike
"Obviously we have an issue of whether the foul third strike supersedes a foul catch."
No, "we" don't. One of us is confusing "touched" with caught, they are not the same.
A ball that is in flight off the bat that is "caught" can never be foul.
It's a caught fly ball and caught fly balls are live.
A ball that was foul, can not be caught, because it either hit (beyond 1B-3B), settled, was touched (read booted), or hit something over foul territory.
|
My apologies for including you.
For all otherss, I am seeking an official rule book reference for this play.
It is impossible to separate touch and catch on this play. The ball was not bobbled (nor booted) and no mention of an improper release occured. The second the player touched it, it was caught. The ensuing play, as described indicates as much.
Anyone else seen an umpire watch a batted ball get caught in foul territory, signal catch and then point foul? Why indicate the place of catch if a caught fly ball is just a caught fly ball?
Thank you.