Quote:
Originally Posted by rwest
Except when an official interpretation disagrees with your interpretation.  |
I didn't say they'd be right. But I've seen it happen. "There's no team control, infraction, or goal involved in this play so we're going AP."
Or when the rule disagrees with your statement that AP is not POI. 4-36-2c
It's all one rule, 4-36, which is the definition of POI.
I'm all for a good debate, even one on semantics and logic.
My issue is that more people come to the wrong conclusion by not thinking AP is one portion of the POI rule. "Do we go AP or POI?" It's a question based on an incorrect understanding of the rule.