View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 07, 2011, 07:13am
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigsig View Post
ASA Bat Question:
We have many local leagues who’s players want to hit home runs.
The leagues have started to submit to these player demands and are allowing any bat.
I'm shocked!

Quote:
Can an ASA Umpire officiate a local league (ASA or non-ASA) which elects to use any bats, including those listed on ASA website as “Banned”, and be covered by the ASA liability insurance if someone is injured?
To start, there is no such thing as a "banned" bat, only non-approved.

Secondly, yes, you are covered. But I believe it is preferred by Bollingers and other umpires that you not work those types of games. Why? Because even though you are covered, claims against that coverage will certainly cause an increase in the cost of the insurance to all umpires and, at some point, may cause that umpire/association to become uninsurable depending upon the cost to the underwriter of the policy.

Is that the worst-case scenario? Absolutely. However, just because we have insurance, doesn't mean using it should commonplace. As we have all seen over the past few years, claims against our insurance has caused an increase in the deductable and decrease in coverage. I fully expect ASA umpires to see an increase in registration costs next season to off-set the cost of insurance.

OTOH, if the league wants to become a primary insurer, hey, go for it.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote