Bob, please take a look at the Federation case book, caes # 5.11.3a AND 5.11.3B.
Richard, please take another look at cases 5.11.3A and 5.11.3B. In both cases one time-out was properly granted after the expiration of playing time. It's the second, or successive, time-out request that is denied.
Also, note that Rule 5.12.3 states: "Successive time-outs shall not be granted..." If no time-outs were to be granted at all, the word "successive" would have been deleted...
|