Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch85
That is a lot to read in to rule 5-2-1.
I agree the rule was written to take the judgement out. Taking the position above is adding a lot of judgement back in.
IMO, 5-2-1 and 5.2.1C(b) in the case book gives us only one choice. Count it as 3.
|
If you go back to when it was changed and the reason it was changed, it is not so hard to come to that conclusion.
There is another case play (someone else can look it up) that has a thrown ball (try) that bounces off a defender's head and into the basket. The ball was thrown from behind the 3-point arc. The ruling in that case play is that it counts for 2 points. Why? At the point in time where the "try" is over (certain it will not be successful, below the rim, hits the floor, etc.) the thrown ball can no longer score for 3 points....any subsequent deflection is a NEW action. So, a thrown ball that can not possibly go in as released is not subject to being 3-points.
The judgement removed is in the intent of the thrower, not whether the "try" has ended or not. The former requires the reading of a mind. The latter only requires the observation of physical facts.