Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
When I think of the backcourt interp in those terms, it doesn't sound quite as off-the-wall as it initially looked.
|
True. Unfortunately one part of the rule is written in terms of last touch/first touch (9-9-1 and all five 9.9.1 case plays), and another part of the rule is written in terms of causing the ball to change status (9-9-2 and various Interps). These are different criteria, and the confusion stems from NFHS pretending that they're not.
The OOB rule is strictly in terms of causing the ball to change status, and so there's no confusion.