Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn
How about 7-1-7b
Hut-Hut-HutHutt!
b. Any act is clearly intended to cause B to encroach.
I have heard many officials say that snap count falls under this but I say, snap count is not an ACT. It is verbiage, now if the team runs a play that is just snap counts and no snap, that ACT was clearly designed to draw B into the NZ.
|
Of course the snap count is an act. The rule
should prohibit acts whose ONLY purpose is to cause B to encroach. Since a snap count is part of the sequence leading to a snap, and since teams are legally permitted to vary their snap count, this kind of deception is not a violation of the rules.