Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
I think he's really trying to say that if the arm movements are not natural to the play, his assumption is far more likely to be that the arm movements are intentional, and an attempt to interfere with the throw. If, however, the arm movements just look like a kid protecting himself, the tendency would be to assume just that - he's not trying to interfere, he's just protecting himself.
I didn't think he was inventing anything ... just perhaps not completely explaining his meaning.
|
Your reading is more charitable than mine. I suppose I've seen too many people post that something is "not a baseball play" and a violation of "common sense," so they're going to get an out or start awarding bases.
The good news is that nobody has posted that the runner getting hit in the back counts as INT.
