View Single Post
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 14, 2010, 01:19pm
jkumpire jkumpire is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
JM, No You didn't.

With respect, that is how I was taught the rule and it was explained at pro school in 1985. How can reality be confusing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43 View Post
Not John, thats JM, however:

In all of my teachings, the terms relaxed/unrelaxed have never been used. Runners are either trying to touch a base or they aren't. Sematics, probably. When it comes to appeals on missed bases, excluding home plate, you first have to determine if it is a force play or a tag play. Then you can determine the correct way for appealing the infraction. J/R uses the rule for missed home plate and applies that standard for all other bases. Not entirely true since the appeal of a missed base in which runner was forced or on BR missing first is treated differently as stated prior. First base is probably the only base you are going to have to treat that way since a runner who is forced and overruns 2nd or 3rd and misses the base will be able to correct his mistake immediately or continue to advance. These appeals are usually after continuing action has stopped. First is different in the fact that the BR is allowed to overrun 1st without penalty in and of itself.

There, now I really confused the issue.
Reply With Quote